Existentialism emerged in Paris after World War Two as an intellectual movement catching the imagination of young intellectuals. Jean-Paul Sartre was its somewhat unwilling representative, becoming associated with it through his stories, novels and plays. This was augmented by hearsay about his wartime book,Being and Nothingness, which is much too difficult for most people to follow. To read it well, you need a classical education and a wide reading of philosophy, especially in the tradition that runs from Plato and Aristotle to Descartes, through Kant, Hegel and Marx, to Husserl and Heiddeger. Sartre is the inheritor of Cartesian dualism and German phenomenology and to understand his technical philosophy requires a good deal of learning.
The buzz-words in the cafés were “choice”, “freedom”, “consciousness” and “absurdity”. The emblem of existentialism for the philosophically unsophisticated was the acte gratuiteor meaningless action. Sartre graphically pictures this in his novel,The Age of Reason. The hero, a professional philosophy teacher named Mathieu, is flirting with one of his more outrageous students in a nightclub, when she deliberately sets out to shock some respectable middle class patrons by slicing her hand with a knife and making them watch her blood flow. This is absurd, not to say stupid. To Mathieu, it looks like a heroic act of freedom in defiance of respectability and normality. It can appear as a gesture of pure freedom, since both reason and nature argue against slicing your hand. To outdo her in sheer absurdity, Mathieu takes the knife and pins his hand to the table before the shocked stares of the other patrons. Later, when the euphoria wears off, and the pain sets in, Mathieu berates himself for stabbing himself just to impress an immature young woman.
This is not freedom, and Sartre never suggests it is. To act freely is not to do absurd things in anacte gratuite, but to act with reasons to make a change in the world. On the other hand, Mathieu did freely stab himself, but no differently than if he had chosen to do something more sensible, like taking the girl off to bandage her hand. Sartre argues that freedom is absolute, and belongs to our being-in-the-world as a matter of existence (ontology) and the human condition.
The confusion of freedom with theacte gratuite is just one of many in the minds of the young intellectuals who followed existentialism. They took Sartre’s writings as inviting them to smash traditions, Gods, fathers and values. They took the message that since the universe is absurd, it doesn’t matter what you do. There is no ultimate meaning or value, so we must make it for ourselves. There is no “human nature”, no essence that defines us. We are what we do, and there is nothing to stop us recreating ourselves. We face the world without hope and without chains. Brave new words.
Existentialism became part of a wider philosophy of liberation and revolt against traditional authorities. It also became associated with hedonism and amorality. Sartre wanted to detach himself from the pastiche of his philosophy circulating in the streets.Existentialism as a Humanismis a polemical work in which Sartre uses rhetorical devices to counter mistakes about his philosophy as he sees it. We must remember that he wrote to a contemporary audience, and not to us. Therefore, he uses arguments to fit the circumstances of the debate, and if Sartre seems at times to argue badly, it may be simply that he is writing for a different time and a different audience. He is saying what will counter bad publicity. Sometimes he does argue badly, at others, he backslides into the tradition that he rejects in order to make his points. This paradox runs through all of Sartre’s philosophy. He is shaped by the tradition he seeks to transcend, so he never entirely succeeds in transcending it. This should be kept in mind in readingExistentialism as a Humanism.
In this book Sartre argues that existence precedes essence for conscious creatures like ourselves. What this means is that we exist first and acquire an essence or meaning later. For example, I was not born a philosopher, but made myself one by studying the writings of the philosophers. If I continue to do this until I die, which is, after all, up to me, then you can write “Here lies a philosopher” on my tombstone. It was never written in the stars, and if I stop doing all my philosophical activities tomorrow, I will cease to be a philosopher, though it will always be true that I was one. The epithet belongs to me in the mode of “having-been”. We must maintain our characters through actions. No one can know themselves as they know other things. Our qualities do not belong to us as they do to them. We do not have qualities, but live them.
If you have no nature, then nothing constrains your actions. You must make an existential choice everyday to continue to be the sort of person you have been up until now. You must make the big choices of life alone. It is no good seeking advice, for by the time you have decided whose advice to seek, you have already made up your mind what you are going to do. Conscious deliberation simply confirms a prior choice.
As free conscious beings we are responsible for our actions and their consequences. We are also responsible for our non-actions and their consequences. Nothing grounds our projects. We stand on a void, and it makes one dizzy to look down. All the common certainties vanish, and suddenly human lives appear false, as though everyone was trying to be something they are not, or trying not to be something they are. No one takes responsibility for the free acts they make of their lives. This is bad faith. The truth does make you dizzy at first, but you have to get used to it.
We have to live without excuse from now on, without a transcendent crutch, without a purpose or a meaning. There is no designer who made us according to some pre-conceived pattern. We have to make ourselves in a world we did not choose. Life is contingent and can be snuffed out at any second, will be snuffed out at some second in the future. Our existence isde trop, superfluous, extraneous to requirements. Every one must live with a kind of ontological insecurity induced by the awareness of mortality. This is the famous “Existential Angst” or “Dread” signified by a black beret and turtleneck sweater, French cigarettes and espresso. We must lose the last of our innocence, or fall back into self-deception. We have to find a way to live with anxiety and to use its energy creatively, not escape into bad faith. Our situation in the world is risky and scary, but we have to face up to it.
Now a critic asks how Sartre is able to generalise so much about human anguish, if there is no human nature? How can he know that all of us are anxious about our being-in-the-world, even when we are not consciously aware of it? Isn’t ontological insecurity part of human nature? Isn’t freedom part of human being’s essence, since we are defined by it? Sartre tries to answer these questions in his other writings, but since he isn’t here to answer for himself, I will argue for him.
We need a distinction between the idea of human nature and that of the human condition. The idea of a thing’s nature, as well as of its essence, pictures beings with qualities, for example, a solid inkwell. The object is positive through and through. Even a triangle has a certain nature and is defined in a certain way. It’s essential properties are necessary to it and common to all other triangles. If we think this way about conscious beings like ourselves, then we arrive at an Aristotelian definition of human beings as rational animals. The term “animal” captures our genus; the term “rational” captures our essence. Sartre argues that this definition leaves out our existence as conscious beings.
Ontological insecurity does not belong to ournature. We might find a way to keep our bodies going indefinitely. The insecurity belongs to ourcondition. This we share with other people, not a nature with an essence. It is part of our condition to be born, to act and respond to the world and other people, and to face the possibility of dying. Even if we could, in principle, keep our bodies going forever, there is always the chance one will be obliterated in a great explosion. Our being is in question for ourselves because we are conscious of our dependence on things in the world for our continued existence.
Freedom is not part of human nature, but that which releases us from it. We find ourselves abandoned in a vast universe that owes us nothing. Consciousness is a “nothingness” at the heart of being. We make of human nature what we want, and in history we see what we have made of it. It is the same thing to choose, act, be free and to be conscious. A world is revealed in which we find ourselves obliged to choose and act. Ontological insecurity is the flip side of freedom, and it frames the human condition. We have no one to blame for our own actions but ourselves, no excuse, no fate or destiny. Such things appear only in hindsight.
It would be so much nicer to have an essence, so much safer. I could be myself then, rather than condemned to be free. I could rest quietly in my fate and not struggle against it. There would be no more existential choices, no more unbearable responsibility, no anxiety. We could come to look forward to personal extinction or hope for immortality. Religion steps in at this point to offer salvation as a kind of sanctified self-deception.
Sartre is an atheist. The idea of God is an impossible dream. It is a projection of ourselves without the contingency and absurdity that clings to our existence in the world. God overcomes all powerlessness, all meaninglessness, and death itself. He exists in Himself and for Himself and therefore has all the benefits of consciousness without weakness of human flesh.
Existentialism is the scourge of the dream of perfect Being. The cancellation of God puts us back into a more honest appreciation of our situation as involving both freedom and resistance. Our freedom does not cover all the things which we did not choose, and had no choice about. It does not cover who your parents were, what language you grew up speaking, your neighbourhood, economic circumstances, genetic inheritance, etc. Freedom covers action and includes the adoption of attitudes toward the unchosen facts of one’s life.
The world is there. The world is real. There is no other world that is more real than the one in which we live. Being is; how we respond to it is up to us. The only thing that limits freedom is freedom itself. Consciousness, or existence for itself, must choose, and by choosing limits itself. There is nothing outside us that can determine our choices and actions. We must make our own history and be responsible for what we make of ourselves. We create and maintain the values by which we live.
The main problem with all this is that most people are unable or unwilling to create their own values, or understand that their choice is the only underpinning their value system has. We flee into the security of an imagined being, or we flee from being altogether into our own imagination. We pretend that we are free without restrictions, or that our situation makes us choose what we do. The fact is that we encounter both a choice and something to choose in every situation we find ourselves. We discover our facticity and our transcendence. To pretend to be exclusively the one or the other is to fall into the pervasive patterns of bad faith that Sartre describes so famously inBeing and Nothingness.
All this points to a very individualist philosophy. The individual faces an indifferent world equipped with no more than her or his own choices and commitments. At best, we live an authentic independent life, recognising contingency and transcendence, and not hiding the facts of conscious existence under religious or philosophical veils. We can be brave and resolute, live beyond despair and hope, lucid about our prospects and our condition. These are the elements of the authentic life.
Where does this leave ethics and morality? Human beings are social as well as rational animals. We must live with them, for it is difficult to be a hermit on a crowded planet. The question is whether there are any limits to the values by which we should choose to live. Does the moral “ought” have any hold on the resolute existentialist? Does the project of living authentically imply an ethical value system. Are there limits to the values that we should choose, if we want to live authentically? In Existentialism as a Humanism, Sartre tries to argue just that. How well he succeeds will be the topic of Part 2.
You might also like...
Issue 84 Forum: introduction
ExistentialismSee AlsoPolicies & Procedures - Gold Coast SchoolsRACHAEL RAY NUTRISH Soft Spots Salmon Soft & Savory Cat Treats, 2.5-oz pouch, 2.5-oz pouch, bundle of 2 - Chewy.comVolume Pills Review:Drug used to halt puberty in children may cause lasting health problems(Video) Jean-Paul Sartre | Wikipedia audio article
What is Existentialism?
Stephen Priest scouts two hundred years of reflection on questions concerning human existence.
Owen Flanagan and Gregg D. Caruso on a new search for meaning.(Video) The Philosopher Tierlist
Simone de Beauvoir: a snapshotSee AlsoIEP Goals Anxiety Can Go Away - Mindfully Educating100 Most Inspiring Mountain Instagram Captions | 2022 - A Broken BackpackWeed Near Me: The Better Way to Find Weed for Sale Anywhere (2022)Working in Germany After Graduation - Study in Germany for Free
A snapshot of the work of feminist philosopher Simone de Beauvoir.
Sartre says that he will next clarify three concepts: anguish, abandonment, and despair. The basic outline of Sartre's argument is now complete: existence precedes essence, so human life should be viewed as a project of creating purpose.What book should I start with Sartre? ›
La Nausée. Sartre's first novel, La Nausée, was published in 1938. This book is widely considered the most authentic representation of Sartre's existentialist thought.What is the goal of Sartre's Existentialism is a Humanism? ›
INTRODUCTION TO Existentialism is a Humanism
The Existentialist ideal begins with the idea that humans should stop wasting time puzzling over the curiosity of their own existence and begin instead by accepting it as a fact, the first and most necessary fact; "existence precedes essence".
Sartre's theory of existentialism states that “existence precedes essence”, that is only by existing and acting a certain way do we give meaning to our lives. According to him, there is no fixed design for how a human being should be and no God to give us a purpose.What are the 4 major themes of existentialism? ›
The four themes of Existentialism that I found to be the most significant and recurring in the works of the existentialists are as follows: the individual, God, being, and truth.What are the five main themes of existentialism? ›
- Who Am I?
- The lack of norms, and anxiety.
- Meaning and absurdity.
- Self-deception and authenticity.
- The individual and 'they'
- Irreligion and religion.
- At the Existentialist Café, by Sarah Bakewell. ...
- Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre, by Walter Kaufmann. ...
- The Cambridge Companion to Existentialism, by Steven Crowell. ...
- Either/Or: A Fragment of Life, by Søren Kierkegaard. ...
- Being and Nothingness, by Jean-Paul Sartre.
“Man is condemned to be free; because once thrown into the world, he is responsible for everything he does. It is up to you to give [life] a meaning.”What is the main point of existentialism? ›
Existentialism is the philosophical belief we are each responsible for creating purpose or meaning in our own lives. Our individual purpose and meaning is not given to us by Gods, governments, teachers or other authorities.What are the two types of existentialism Sartre? ›
In Existentialism and Humanism Jean-Paul Sartre states that there are “two kinds of existentialists,” the atheistic, in which he includes himself, and the Christian, among whom he includes his fellow countryman Gabriel Marcel.
To ground these claims and produce a lexicon for his extremely complex phenomenology, Sartre develops a dense metaphysics that chops up reality into three fundamental types of being: being-in-itself and being-for-itself and being-for-others.What are three beliefs of existentialism? ›
Of this work, there are generally three core principles that emerge as central to existentialist philosophy: phenomenology, freedom, and authenticity.What are the six themes of existentialism? ›
- Existence precedes essence.
- Life is absurd.
- Nothingness and Death.
- Fear, Dread, Anxiety.
In the pseudonymous works of Kierkegaard's first literary period, three stages on life's way, or three spheres of existence, are distinguished: the aesthetic, the ethical, and the religious.Does existentialism believe in God? ›
Since existentialism focuses on real, material successes and actions, it can't acknowledge the presence of a god in order to truly find meaning within a human's life.What are the two basic concepts of existentialism? ›
According to existentialism: (1) Existence is always particular and individual—always my existence, your existence, his existence, her existence. (2) Existence is primarily the problem of existence (i.e., of its mode of being); it is, therefore, also the investigation of the meaning of Being.Who is the most famous existentialist? ›
1. Jean-Paul Sartre. French philosopher, screenwriter, playwright, novelist and literary critic Jean-Paul Sartre was the eminent voice of Existentialism. His standout contributions to the field of Existentialism include the philosophical treatise Being and Nothingness, 1943.What are the key problems for existentialism? ›
The key problems for existentialism are those of the individual himself, of his situation in the world, and of his more ultimate significance.Do existentialists believe in love? ›
This responsibility of each human can be both magnificent and overwhelming, something that the existential philosophers touch on over and over again in their writings. So the existentialist defines love for themselves, even though the idea of love is a long and storied cultural tradition.Can an existentialist be happy? ›
Finally, it argues that existentialists can be happy by showing that negative emotions play an essential role in how we apprehend and respond to the world positively and meaningfully.
It's important to consider that Existentialism encourages selfishness and introspection, given that its emphasis on personal choice and conscious being. While this could easily make us much less willing to help and consider others before ourselves, there are elements we should all incorporate into our lives.What are the 3 key terms for understanding Sartre's ethical approach? ›
The key concepts in the Sartrean analysis of ethics are: freedom, angst, bad faith, and authenticity. We discuss each in turn. We begin our discussion with Sartre's notion that we are radically free. If we are in a bad mood, for example, it's because we choose to be.What is the most famous line from Sartre's play No Exit? ›
“Hell is Other People.” That's actually a famous line from French philosopher Jean Paul Sartre's 1944 play, “No Exit.” In the play, three characters arrive in Hell.What is Jean-Paul Sartre's view of the self? ›
Sartre proposes therefore to view the ego as a unity produced by consciousness. In other words, he adds to the Humean picture of the self as a bundle of perceptions, an account of its unity. This unity of the ego is a product of conscious activity.What is one book that everyone should read? ›
"Pride and Prejudice" by Jane Austen. "The Diary of Anne Frank" by Anne Frank. "1984" by George Orwell. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" by J.K. Rowling.What is a must-read books of a lifetime? ›
Must-read books include "To Kill A Mockingbird," "A Brief History of Time," "Americanah," and "How To Win Friends And Influence People."What is the number 1 read book? ›
The Holy Bible is the most read book in the world. In the past 50 years, the Bible has sold over 3.9 billion copies. It is the most recognizable and famous book that has ever been published. The Bible is a collective book with many different preachings based on God and the Lord Jesus Christ.What is the first principle of existentialism? ›
Man is nothing else but that which he makes of himself. That is the first principle of existentialism.What does existentialism mean in simple terms? ›
Existentialism is a way of thinking that focuses on what it means for people to exist. It is a philosophical movement. It became well known in books and movies of the 19th and 20th centuries. Existentialism is known for dealing with nihilistic problems, but is generally still a kind of anti-nihilism.Is Sartre a nihilism? ›
Sartre was an optimist, not a nihilist | Ian Birchall | The Guardian.
Jean-Paul Sartre had strong opinions on free will and responsibility. He believed that humans are radically free and thus radically responsible for their actions.Was Sartre narcissistic? ›
Sartre's was a narcissistic love; Tintoretto was his alter ego.Was Sartre a Marxist? ›
Sartre also became a crucial figure in Marxist thought with “Materialism and Revolution” (1946), The Question of Method (1957), and the first volume of Critique of Dialectical Reason (1960). He was extremely active in leftist politics in France and internationally for more than 30 years.What's the opposite of existentialism? ›
So Existentialism is the opposite of nihilism: the nihilist says "There is no god, no heaven or hell, so screw it: there can be no right or wrong.Is Harry Potter an existentialist? ›
Harry Potter and Lord Voldemort are not only the protagonist and antagonist of the series, but also represent two sides of the spectrum of existential psychology. While they share similar backgrounds and characteristics, Harry is portrayed as an ideal being possessing additional qualities that Voldemort does not.Do existentialists believe in souls? ›
So for the existentialists there are two types of real things, two types of things that exist: BEING-FOR –ITSELF and BEING-IN-ITSELF. There is no proof of souls or spirits or ghosts or deities and thus their existence is nothing other than what people make a decision to believe.What are the three main ideas of humanism? ›
Humanists tend to advocate for human rights, free speech, progressive policies, and democracy. Those with a humanist worldview maintain religion is not a precondition of morality, and object to excessive religious entanglement with education and the state.What are the three core principles of humanism? ›
The humanistic approach emphasizes the personal worth of the individual, the centrality of human values, and the creative, active nature of human beings.What is Sartre's most famous existentialist idea? ›
Transcendence of the Ego: The Discovery of Intentionality. One of the most famous foundational moments of existentialism concerns Sartre's discovery of phenomenology around the turn of 1932/3, when in a Parisian bar listening to his friend Raymond Aron's description of an apricot cocktail (de Beauvoir 1960 [1962: 135]) ...What is the golden rule for humanism? ›
Many humanists use the Golden Rule to help them decide what to do. 'Treat other people as you'd want to be treated in their situation. ' 'Do not treat others in a way you would not like to be treated yourself.
It then explores what form a genuine humanism might have by presenting seven propositions labeled as: 1) wholeness, 2) comprehensive knowledge, 3) human dignity, 4) development, 5) common good, 6) transcendence, and 7) stewardship-sustainability.What are the 4 values of humanism? ›
Humanism directs us to an ethics of care, a practice of care, the development of a compassionate temperament and the importance of love and kindness in human lives.What are the 5 key teachings of humanism? ›
There are no supernatural beings. The material universe is the only thing that exists. Science provides the only reliable source of knowledge about this universe. We only live this life - there is no after-life, and no such thing as reincarnation.
Humanists do not believe in a god. They believe it is possible to live a good and fulfilling life without following a traditional religion. They do not follow a holy book either. Instead, Humanists value traits like reason and rely on science to explain the way things are.What are the 3 main criticisms of humanistic psychology? ›
- Naive assumptions. critics suggest that the humanistic perspective is unrealistic, romantic, and even naive about human nature.
- poor testability and inadequate evidence. humanistic concepts are difficult to define operationally and test scientifically.